I was forced to learn some of it at work (using and signing medical payment transactions, with x509 certificates) so I have ar least a starting point. I have no idea how the revoke process works though, I can’t figure out a way that it functions without a central authority getting queried regularly. I thonk I can start without that knowledge though.

Anyway, with your information I’m up and running, thank you again!

“Derived certificates” not child certs, noted !

Thank you!

Is there some simple soft that let you make those certs, like with a root cert and then “derived” certs? On linux :-) ?

I guess people have to re-trust every now and then because certs get old, or do they trust the (public partof the) root cert and the daughter certs derived from root are churned out regularly for the sites?

But you have to manually accept this dangerous cert in the browser right?

Very interesting actually, do you have any experience about it or other pointers? I might just set one up myself for my tenfingers sharing protocol…

And you still can’t self certify.

It’s cute the big players are so concerned with my little security of my little home server.

Or is there a bigger plan behind all this? Like pay more often, lock in to government controlled certs (already done I guess because they control DNS and you must have a “real” website name to get a free cert)?

I feel it’s 50% security 50% bullshit.

Edit: thank you all I will dive down the CA certification rabbit hole now! Have worked in C++ & X509 on the client side so maybe I’ll be able to figure it out.

???

So what’s the problem with those protocols?

One main difference with IPFS is that you can change the shared data without having to re-distribute a new link. It’s also based on reciprocal sharing instead of benevolent sharing, which means that if someone shares then it grows the sharing capability of the network instead of using it up.

I have made some comparatifs, you are all welcome posting any questions you have here or there ofc. ☺️ !

Sort of P2P, it’s a sharing system based on reciprocal sharing (I share yours because you share mine), add sharing the same data several times and you get robustness.

A sort of decentralised file system.

Please let me know what you think about it all.

PS. Funkwhale seems interesting, gotta check that out, thanks!

Thanks, I edited in a quick link and the dumbass is me not you!

Nice site, but the prices are way bigger when you click the link or is it I who doesn’t get how it works?

Thanks, seems great!

14TB for $160 seems insanely low/good price, even for refurbished?

Or where do you get prices like that?! (I’m in the EU BTW).

What about Mint /s

But Mint though :-)

Yeah, but there are enough MAC adresses. Anyways we’re stuck with this I guess, IPv4 or unreadable IPv6 adresses.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? /j

Yeah I’m onboard using raw IP adresses but I’m probably annoutlier here 😊

Also, who didtributes the IP adresses 😖 why didn’t they go with MAC adresses.

It’s more like installing filters because sometimes they put malaria in the gasoline IMO.

Preppers believe some conspiracy doomsday shit, which is why nobody wants to be labeled a “prepper” I guess.

Well I did hope for an answer, but all I got was victim blaming.

If you can’t say, respectfully, what you think, how do you think there could be a meaningful excange of ideas?

For what I have understood: you roughly think all actual existing government are bad, police is bad, banks are bad, enforcing rules are bad, having your own things are bad.

If that’s so, how is your society suppose to do anything productive or useful?

Okay, like I’d love everyone getting together well, but I know it won’t happen, but I can still try, and maybe make the world a little better.

Your ideas are absolutists, there is no possible gradation, and even taken one by one they are insane idea that has never worked, and you want both? How is that even going to work? No property, no rulers, I mean good luck with that.

It’s just not possible to have a serious conversation here, so I wish you luck!

Cheers

Edit: well look at all that civilised discussion right here! Ah no? Only anonymous downvotes without any reason? Who would have thought…

PS. If you’re not a pro authoritarian please accept my apologies.

Oh I see, it is I who have to “welcome a different option”.

Most of “communism” here on lemmy is either hardcore stalin/lenin/mao authoritarian ruling or it is some sort of workers dictatorship. What’s not to criticise? And when you try to discuss you get downvoted and people act aggressively, or so I feel.

I also does not know what that has to do with anarchism?

I have tried to talk to anarchists here, as I feel there is potentially something to it, but it always ends up with “read this and shut up libtard”-like posts. A shame, we should welcome different opinions and angles seing things, not always try to “convert” everyone to some very specific thing. IMO.