Profits are a bit like internal taxes on wages.

Co-op NPOs should use these taxes to further the company’s goals instead of crude extraction into the goals of the owners.

Those aren’t perfect, because once they reach a certain size any form of corruption can have big bad consequences. The Fediverse approach to this is “decentralisation”, but all decentralisation efforts have an API vulnerability - there needs to be a central body that develops the “language” between the actors.

On the other hand, you might not have an ear for any of this, because you might be dependent on your business’ profits.

deleted by creator

it’s not even this instance

Some supermarkets have them

Germans don’t have sentences, they have long words.

Sabbel ma nich so vonner seit döspaddel

SPEAK ENGLISH ÖR DIE

Toodaloo

Was?

If this were a strategic stance by Meta, what would be reasons of them for it?

I’d argue that at this point, sticking to the collective vs individual dichotomy of climate attribution and action potential is climate action delayist. When your argument relies you or your group intentionally doing absolutely nothing to combat climate change, you don’t really have climate change in mind.

Leftism sometimes cares more about class than its very foundation, the environment, to understand why there is a problem with blame-shifting.

I’ve seen this in a similar fashion in relationship advice forums: Commenters not engaging with the issue or person, but knee-jerk reacting with advising instant breakup.

I haven’t been on reddit for over a year, but I cannot imagine that topics like say atheism don’t polarise. What makes you think it is the case?

I don’t quite understand your point. Do you maybe have some examples to understand better?

I never interacted with mozilla.social, but I wonder if they considered organising mozilla.social through a connected volunteer association, before deciding to shutdown.

From the comments I see, feddit.uk seems to have the lowest unit costs with 11 pennce.

No, votes should not be displayed public.

Blocking those who downvote creates further polarisation, echo chambers and an environment more hostile to discussion and honest exchange.

Following those who upvote creates personality cults and nepotism and devalues the content.

I’m saying this for years, but a) it’s quite late (seems like a 1990s issue) and b) OpenNIC is a bit of a joke atm (but support it anyways)

ICANN never should’ve been a creature of US-NTIA, but of the UN. The US has no right to decide for the digital world how everyone communiticates. No one really should (apart from about stuff like CSAM).

Why?

I like the concept of NewPipe combining several content providers.

To me, NewPipe’s Peertube would be better with a search function that can select any server as base.