BolexForSoup

Because a lot of people depend on references from their previous job, including their managers and such, for the next one. Burning that bridge because you wouldn’t spend your last few weeks at the company doing what was asked of you is not a good look. It makes you appear difficult/like you hold grudges. It also might cost you things like your severance.

If it’s that important to you to flip a middle finger to your previous employer then go ahead, but I think most people will decide the cons vastly outweigh the pros. Especially since that person will get trained anyway so you can’t even meaningfully change things.

Give me a fucking break. You wrote the “black Jewish lesbian” response to me above and then have the stones to accuse someone of playing dumb?

It’s not covered in section 5. Go read it.

The federal government sets the bare minimum protections for people.

Have never read a discrimination clause before? You don’t have to list literally ever combination. This is ignorant at its most charitable interpretation.

See? This is the shit I’m talking about. People here going “it doesn’t matter” yet here you are showing us exactly why it matters.

deleted by creator

If it’s not a big deal then it shouldn’t be too hard to mention you can’t discriminate against someone’s religion/race/gender/etc.

These things are a big enough deal they need to be removed but suddenly “it’s not a big deal” when people want them back.

Not a single mention of discrimination because it doesn’t say anything about religion/race/gender/etc. It needs to specify this to be a rule about discrimination. Even the US federal government - which is the bare minimum - has this spelled out in employment laws and other areas.

Isn’t rumble pretty right-wing or am I mixing them up with a different site?