

Saving for later
Saving for later
The black box is the mini PC (note the Ethernet cable going into it) and the yellow/red/black cable is a single SATA power cable, that is daisy chained. Going from the PC to the drive and then going back to the fan control board
Edit: looks like it’s actually 3 SATA cables. Not daisy chained
Fuck you :)
ah, makes sense. didn’t know that mbin hides the instance. Maybe as an additional link after the current one?
In any case: thanks for the work so far! Great service
for the links to a discussion, yes. But for a link to the community which has been decided, it’s probably more user friendly to just do the exclamation mark style instead of a normal link
Any chance of using the !-format for the links in the list? makes it easier to just visit and subscribe
y’all know that web 2.0 includes things like lemmy, right?
I’ve already seen people bringing back webrings
fyi, you can link with a ! to instances, and they get automatically converted to local user instance links:
Abolutely necessarily.
it works like this:
@privateuser@mastodon.example.com
has a “followers only account”.@someuser@pixelfed.example.com
is a friend of above account, requested access and was granted. This now causes mastodon.example.com
to push all messages of @privateuser
to pixelfed.example.com
.@anotheruser@pixelfed.example.com
requests access, but gets ignored. But the pixelfed instance marks the user as “follows @privateuser
”@someuser
, the messages are shown as expected.@anotheruser
, they are also shown. Because PF basically does a database “select messages of users that the user follows”, without checking if the access was ever granted.Important to note, that this would not happen, if the messages weren’t already pushed to the server due to the “allowed” user
ActivityPub is a half-assed unfinished mess.
tried working on my own service and figured this one out very fast.
It’s amazing that it works at all. 98% of the stuff is not documented at all. and the stuff that is, can hardly be called documentation.
that’s the problem. you can’t really, without opening the image.
But so far, it doesn’t really appear to be a problem
the problem with this potential issue (if it indeed is one) is, that you don’t need to reply. just opening the DM is enough
fwiw I got the exact image URL in a DM a couple minutes ago. so at least they are not mapping the uuid of the image to a DMd fedi user
no, it’s a decentralised service on the decentralized internet
Saving for later
While on the topic of masto poll games: we need more active participants over at Fedi Plays Pokemon:
Reddit still has them. And already rolled back edits where useful
Basically by being (often pretentious) assholes.
But if you scroll his timeline a bit (it really isn’t that much), you can see similar discussions
It’s a perfectly valid way to explain it, though
If you try to show up with “cryptography” as an explanation, people will think of encrypting messages, not proof of work
“Cryptocurrency with the currency” really is the perfect single sentence explanation