You both aren’t wrong… But this isn’t about you.

I spent an unhealthy amount of time on Reddit. Getting bored of Lemmy is a feature, not a bug. Embrace it.

I dunno. You could throw yourself down the stairs. It’s an awful choice, but you could still do it…

The point is, a choice with all kinds of negative consequences to it isn’t really a choice.

Terminals are powerful and flexible, but still slower than a dedicated UI to see states at a glance, issue routine commands, or do text editing.

Terminal absolutists are as insufferable as GUI purists. There is a place and time for both.

You should perhaps skim through https://docs.docker.com/storage/ quickly. That document explains that docker containers only have very limited persistence (this is kind of the whole point of containers). The only persistence of note is volumes. This is normally how settings are saved between recreating containers.

As for dependencies, well it’s possible that one container depends on the service of another. Perhaps this is what you are describing?

Either way, for more detailed help, you will have to explain your setup with more specific technical details.

Just a thought, communities dedicated to one particular gender are often not inclusive by design, especially if you actively try to funnel people of a certain gender to certain communities. And therefore they, historically, have tended to devolve into echo chambers, and then subsequently into toxic spaces, with little room for nuanced discussion nor hosting a broad range of opinions. That’s not to say all communities are like this and most don’t start out like that either. There is value to have these communities if they themselves promote inclusion. But putting people of a particular gender into a gender-specific community is not at all the solution to “Too few women on Lemmy”.

I’d rather see the focus on making the general communities be welcoming to everyone equally.

No one else uses the term “cloud” like that.

That part of this comic really stuck out like a sore thumb. I can’t tell if it’s an oversight, a comment about the challenges of self-hosting, or subtle mockery of self-hosting hypocrisy.

“Government” is a pretty broad term. It encompasses both elected or ruling leaders that implement policy (politics), as well as the administrative beaurocracy that implements whatever policy is enacted day to day. It’s pretty typical for the beaurocracy to continue functioning under whatever mandate they have and even to make their own descisions if the mandate gives them that latitude, even if the leadership part of the government is being changed or otherwise non-functional.

I guess people forgot how the internet itself used to be a “monoculture” of nerds and weirdos. Weirdos and nerds have been making the cool trendy places that the mainstream first shuns and mocks then flocks to (maybe “ironically” at first) for centuries. Maybe even millenia.

Information is power. Information is used against you pervasively for control. This control ranges in nefariousness. You want examples? Here are some examples of consequences of use of information as a means of power:

• A present or future employer making HR descisions based on your behaviour outside of work.
• An insurance provider discriminating you and your coverage based on some knowledge like a pre existing condition or behaviour
• Behaviour that is socially acceptable today or appropriate in context being broadcast in the future when it is not or out of context
• Defamation
• Extortion
• Being targeted for having certain political thought
• Being targeted by perpetrators of acts of violence, theft, or nuisance (think swatting)
• Being manipulated into making purchasing or life descisions that are not in your best interest
• Systematic or discrete racial, sexual, religious or other identity discrimination
• …

The usual response to a list like this goes something along the lines of, bah, none of that will happen to me, I’m a goody-two-shoes. That advice is about as good as saying “I’m a good driver, I won’t get into a crash, so I don’t need to wear a seatbelt”. Back to my point, the consequences of information used against you are too far and too abstract for people to accept.

The problem isn’t that people don’t care. The problem is that the negative consequences are too abstract/too far to see. Not so different than smoking or climate change denial.

What does spam/abusive use have to do with Threads specifically.

Also, can you justify your concerns? You just stated a few words without saying why it is a concern. This article did a pretty good job of not only stating the same concern words you used, but why the fears are a bit overblown.

This a 1/1000 likely outcome. Bankrupted companies will typically sell assets including IP and software to other companies to pay creditors (which excludes open sourcing them). And well before bankruptcy, any financial issues will cause Plex to be modified to support shitty monetization to the point that you won’t want the source code amyway.

Sorry for the bad outlook, better that you be ready than to hope for a unicorn.