I like these posts, I feel like there are many levels to any self hosted setup and getting an idea of what everyone is doing is fun.
- 0 Posts
- 14 Comments
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•IPv6 With ISP That Only Does 6rdEnglish
3·6 months agoI did it, well… because I could.
That is a very valid reason. I could see setting it up to learn more about how IPv6 works. I just wanted to see if I could get any actual advantages with it.
office situation where there are a large number of devices
That would make sense as a place to have it. Having a large number of devices where each having an external IP would be handy. My environment really only needs one or two devices having direct external access.
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•IPv6 With ISP That Only Does 6rdEnglish
4·6 months agoI mean, I don’t have NAT traversal between my NAS and devices on my lan now, they are routed because they are different VLANs but that would happen anyway.
Do people have problem with ip conflicts? I guess if I wasn’t running DHCP that would be possible.
Right now NAT is my main firewall between most devices and the wider internet, but I do still run pfsense and have firewall rules in place.
Switching over to IPv6 seems like it would be extra work for very little actual benefit.
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•IPv6 With ISP That Only Does 6rdEnglish
3·6 months agoWhat do you get out of IPv6 for lan routing vs just sticking to IPv4 for everything?
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Western Digital details 14-platter 3.5-inch HAMR HDD designs with 140 TB and beyondEnglish
5·8 months agoIt will take a long time and while it runs it will use a lot of resources so the server can be bogged down. It is also a dangerous time for a NAS, because if you have a drive down, and another drive dies, the whole pool can collapse. The process involves reading every bit on every drive, so it does put strain on everything.
Some people will go out of their way to buy drives from different manufacturing batches so if one batch has a problem, not all of their drives will fail.
The way striping works (at an eli5 level) is you have a bunch of drives and one is a check for everything else. So let’s say you have four 10tb drives. Three would be data and one would be the check, so you get 30tb of usable space.
In reality you don’t have a single drive working as a check, instead you spread the checks across all of the drives, if you map it out with “d” being data and “c” being check it looks like this: dddc ddcd dcdd cddd
This way each drive has the same number of checks on it, and also why we call it striping.
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Western Digital details 14-platter 3.5-inch HAMR HDD designs with 140 TB and beyondEnglish
16·8 months agoWhen you are running a server just to store files (a NAS) you generally set it up so multiple physical hard disks are joined together into an array so if one fails, none of the data is lost. You can replace a failed drive by taking it out and putting in a new working drive and then the system has to copy all of the data over from the other drives. This process can take many hours to run even with the 10-20 TB drive you get today, so doing the same thing with 140 TB drive would take days.
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•I self hosted a World of Warcraft server.English
7·1 year agoI have read that modern servers have np. Bots you can add so you can do dungeons and stuff. I haven’t tried myself. Would love to find a guide on how to set up a Linux host.
I would look into Tailscale based on your responses here. I don’t know what your use case is exactly but you set TS up on your server and then again on your phone/laptop and you can connect them through the vpn directly. No extra exposed ports or making a domain or whatnot.
If you want other people to access the server they will need to make a TS account and you can authorize them.
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.worldto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from LemmyEnglish
6·2 years agoMy point is you have to pick SOME server to host your account. You are right that most communities are accessible from most servers, but that is where it becomes confusing for someone who just wants to look at memes for a specific fan base.
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.worldto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from LemmyEnglish
8·2 years agoThat’s what that Star Trek server did.
The problem with that is that you need to make a user on one of those servers. Do you make it on the politics one, or the games one? What happens 3 months later when you realize the server you picked on a whim is full of assholes and gets defederated?
Do you think an average user at that point would move their subscriptions to a new account or will they get annoyed at the concept?
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Chromecast / Firestick Self Host ReplacementEnglish
3·2 years agoI love my shields, I have both the tube and the pro in different rooms. I like the Jellyfin AndroidTV app more than Kodi. I have side loaded a different launcher to avoid the ads.
I would love to try and replace it, but it needs to be able to handle 4K UHD rips with hdr and the original sound tracks in ATMOS or whatever.
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•What's a good graphics card for jellyfin?English
22·2 years agoSide note. Don’t use hardware acceleration with TDARR. You will get much better encodes with software encoding, which is great for archival and saving storage.
Use hardware acceleration with Jellyfin for transcoding code on the fly for a client that needs it.
If you know what your client specs are, you can use TDARR to reencode everything to what they need and then you won’t have to transcode anything with Jellyfin.
SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Can you host Lemmy on a windows computer?English
0·3 years agoOne thing to note with Docker on Windows is that it will be running the Linux subsystem on top of the Windows stuff when you run Docker, so there will be a performance hit to do that.
It will work, but not necessarily as well as you would like.
I found this comment on what happened by dani-garcia, one of the main devs:
Found here: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/discussions/7473