I don’t see any source code at their docs. Can you point me to them?

Nevermind I found it

https://github.com/koush/scrypted

Yes and no. You can capture frames, stream the output to the local OS or export the feed to be embedded in a website if you like. Also you can put it on the backend of another NVR and use it for long term storage, backup, compression and storage for later investigation. All of that allows for using higher resolution cameras and multiple feeds on smaller drives like a two 4TB disk ZFS stripe or something similar. I often reuse consumer desktops for it when price sensitive clients need security cameras, or remote access to a system already in place.

https://zoneminder.readthedocs.io/en/1.32.3/userguide/viewmonitors.html

Good bot

Yes absolutely.

https://lemmy.world/comment/11918287

Wifi cams can be jammed. Lorex wired cameras and zoneminder with a tailscale VPN setup.

https://www.lorex.com/products/1080p-8-channel-1tb-wired-dvr-system-1?variant=42389948792982

https://wiki.zoneminder.com/Dummies_Guide

https://tailscale.com/kb/1348/guides

If you don’t trust tailscale you’ll have to get some sort of ddns for wireguard and punch through your router

https://www.noip.com/free

https://www.wireguard.com/install/

Let me know if you want further context.

It was reading comprehension that’s the issue I knew it!

Using terminology like win or lose proves my point to hide and anonymize vote totals.

Also that you’ve finished your argument and it didn’t matter what vote total any of your comments has proves it further.

Communities are self regulating with or without upvotes and downvotes. It’s a false economy.

Well the first part is a cogent argument good job! I’ll ignore the ramblings below it.

What you’re describing isn’t working, that’s the argument for the public vs private. To dissuade the gaming of totals that I refernced 6 comments ago now, you’ll have to scroll past your shitposting to get there. I’ll wait.

If you’re fighting what are essentially automated bots that upvote or downvote as much as they like, and then having to verify accounts to ptevent the bots, then distribute tools to auto mods, then restructure again, it’s all a game of cat and mouse. You need community engagement not content moderation. Community tools and culture are how you fight disinformation. Let people communicate their points. Give better sorting in the comments and use many different algos to sort responses. Not just upvote downvote. Arithmetic is very easily gamed for the motivated and loud minority voice. It’s literally the reason many people left Tumblr, Dig, Reddit and will leave Lemmy. A binary choice doesn’t promote discussion it drives “engagement”.

You haven’t even touched on my argument of dopamine buttons. I think it might be your fixation on cleaning products and projection. If you’re going to use the labor of your end users to self moderate then you should hide all upvote/downvote tallies. Also fully anonymise counts. Voting systems are anonymous for many different reasons one is to prevent what has commonly been referred to as influencer clout. Another is to prevent direct targeting of users.

Shhhh shhhh now. I know, it’s hard.

I didn’t say anything about moderators I was talking about moderation. Not who does what or how it’s done. See that’s your job. Intelligent conversation, maybe you’ve seen it modeled somewhere before. I’ll explain it regardless because I don’t think you understood it. Intelligent conversation is when people share ideas, or concepts. Someone says something and then the other person, either supports or refutes it with logic.

Back to moderation vs upvotes. Try to think of what a good solution would be, and then describe it. With details and logic. That’s how the adults in the room like to talk.

You’re just shitposting. Maybe looking for someone, anyone to talk to. You have a weird fixation on cleaning products. Maybe try to talk about other more relatable things. Or you know the topic at hand, that could help.

Your argument is about content moderation not upvotes or downvotes. There is bleach chugging on reddit, likes promote bleach posts on Facebook. Notes on Tumblr are often used to silence or discredit dissent and argument.

What you are wanting is content moderation. Upvotes and down votes are just number go up or down.

I was mistaken my issue with you isn’t your literacy it’s your reading comprehension.

Stay smug tho.

Ah. Smug and disingenuous. Nice to know you didn’t read my comment and posted your opinion anyways.

Don’t tell me what I want

You can anonymise those votes with a hash if your data is structured to need a username for a key value. Use the username as a salt if you must. However the Lemmy API has plenty of metadata to prove a human account that is not a username. Creation date, how many previous comments, if they’re banned from another connected instanxe. This isn’t about mod tooling or APIs this is about anonymity and privacy.

There’s no need for a fediverse wide running tally of upcotes for a comment on Lemmy

I vote for no upvote or downvotes, why build a token for a false economy like the upvote at Reddit or the note at Tumblr or the like on Facebook.

Endorphin buttons are not good for anyone.

Can confirm I am running what I am often is told is overkill here.

7200rpm hitachi 12TB drives

Just measured at 19DB at a meter away running a zpool scrub.

So it definitely depends on which HDD you have.

Use rclone

Absolutely!

If anyone is interested here’s a great thread on it

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/185899/what-is-the-difference-between-a-symbolic-link-and-a-hard-link#185903

Just be cautious when moving or backing up the files, things like rsync and bakula have specific flags needed to preserve symlinks.

Checkout plexamp as your client if you use plex

You can however run any LXC which you can definitely do natively.

Where’s that in the documentation?

Correct, so when I post my song I created to Funkwhale, it’s then federated across the fediverse, living on other servers and able to be downloaded.

Let’s say I use the wikimedia license and allow reproduction of my music as long as I’m credited.

Someone in the fediverse likes my song and they download it. Then use it in their licensed DRM enabled media and give me no credit.

Who then protects my license and attribution rights beside myself? Does this open up others in the fediverse who hosted my media and allowed download to suit? The courts that would hear the case are unlikely to provide a distinction between the user who stole my media and those hosting it.

What prevents Funkwhale from charging a fee for their streaming app and profiting from my song and cutting me out of profit share? Which is exactly what digital distributors do all the time.

How does Funkwhale prevent the upload and sharing of licensed music by unlicensed parties?

None of this is referenced in the documentation or ad copy on the site.

I’ve seen funkwhale posted here multiple times, and these questions are never addressed.