Mutual Aid is not charity. Mutual aid is beneficial for both parties.
Mutual aid for rent would be to join a tenants union so that people can get organized and perform a rent strike.
https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/tenant-unions-for-the-future/
Mutual Aid for food would be something like Food Not Bombs. (It’s an http site so only sign up if you’re comfortable with that.)
http://foodnotbombs.net/new_site/
Charity is not mutual aid.
That’s not mutual aid that’s charity. Mutual aid is mutually beneficial to both parties.
Thanks for the suggestion
What would you suggest instead?
Install fresh tomato to this and you’ll get a much better AP with very good firewall and QOS and traffic inspection. Also good SNMP for monitoring
Rss is the way
Simplest way would be to mount the nfs share natively on the proxmox host and then backup to that file location in storage.
Here’s a good thread on it
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/how-to-setup-nfs-for-proxmox-backups.20525/
If you’re thinking of encryption you need to think about how that could impact data recovery.
Cloudflare tunnels are cheap(free if it’s just a couple), simple, and really great.
You’re using something in front of caddy right?
Atleast refuse basic headers and close connections
add_header X-Robots-Tag "noindex, nofollow, nosnippet, noarchive";
server {
listen 80 default_server;
listen [::]:80 default_server;
listen 443 default_server;
listen [::]:443 default_server;
ssl_certificate certs/server.cert;
ssl_certificate_key certs/server.key;
server_name _;
return 444; #CONNECTION CLOSED WITHOUT RESPONSE
}
Ports, any NAT, internal IPs. The first part of an organized attack is getting environment enumeration down. If a bad actor can map your network they can more efficiently direct their attack.
It’s a custom nginx proxy to the kube api. Too long to get into it. I was hired to move this giant cluster that started as a lab and make it production ready.
Thanks for the feedback
Coredns and an nginx reverse proxy are handling DNS, failover, and some other redirect. However it’s not ideal as it’s a custom implementation a previous engineer setup.
We’re thinking of moving to it from a custom coredns and flannel inplementation in a k3s 33 node cluster.
Tangentially what’s your opinion on Traefik?
Well yes and no. The rate at which you get your data back is where the gotcha lies anything up to 8TB is free if you send them $280 and they’ll refund the money once they get the drive back. Anything over 8TB is where it gets pricey.
Bsckblaze doesn’t care, they know they’ll get their money when @Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works tries to get data back from backup.
Even Daryl Davis says that there’s more Nazis every day
https://www.newsweek.com/daryl-davis-black-lives-matter-kkk-racism-white-genocide-police-1523315
Possibly an outage from a patch no?
Are you backing up files from the FS or sre you backing up the snapshots? I had a corrupted journal from a power outage that borked my install. Could not get to the snapshots on boot. Booted into a live disk and recovered the snapshot that way. Would’ve taken hours to restore from a standard backup, however it was minutes restoring the snapshot.
If you’re not backing up BTRFS snapshots and just backing up files you’re better off just using ext4.
Is it an alternative account you use for differing purposes than other accounts?