I like it. We need more specialization of services and less centralization. If Codeberg is the “human-made FOSS forge” then that means something when you see a project on it. If that’s not your project, fine, there is plenty of competition (and Forgejo is open source just run it yourself).
Would be cool to see someone make a “vibehub” and then you know when you see a link to a project on there what you’re getting (depending on your opinion, good or bad)
GitHub is a business making a profit from git hosting for corporations.
Codeberg is a non-profit explicitly for hosting free software projects (FOSS).
What is Codeberg? On Codeberg you can develop your own Free Software projects, contribute to other projects, browse through inspiring and useful free software, share your knowledge or build your projects a home on the web using Codeberg Pages, just to name a few.
I don’t think they’re delusional enough to think their mission is to singlehandedly kill proprietary software.
Would you be okay with a coding model that was trained only on open source software?
Would be definitely interesting to see a coding model trained only on GPL code, where that also made all of the output also automatically GPL licensed.
Can you link me to the settled law?
FWIW to anyone reading this and shopping for hardware, the card I’m using is an Intel 82599ES.
But I’ve had the same issues on a TrueNAS machine with a Mellanox ConnectX-3. I assume the limited speed was just due to the hardware, but after upgrading from TrueNAS CORE to TrueNAS SCALE, suddenly I was getting full 10 Gbit throughput.
When I got 10 Gbit internet at home I didn’t like the prices of any of the 10G routers for sale so I built my own out of a $80 used ThinkCentre Tiny, $7 PCIe riser, and $20 dual-10G Intel NIC. My APs are the Ubiquiti UniFi APs I was already using (The router I switched from was a Ubiquiti USG3)
Initially I tried opnSense (and pfSense) but no matter what I did I couldn’t get 10G throughput, so I switched to OpenWRT which has been working great. I feel like the Linux kernel will have better support than FreeBSD since it has a bigger user base.
For a 1G/2.5G network you can probably get a way with even cheaper hardware.
My SMB slowness has always been when copying a lot of files, the Finder does something really slow and weird when trying to figure out if the destination can be copied to (dunno if it’s checking for existing files with the same name or what). Once the actual transfer is going it’s fast, but then it hits the next file and pauses for several seconds while it’s doing something
No deduplication. Before replying I tried doing some research to find where the 1 TB/1 GB rule came from originally but couldn’t find any original source, and everything I found said that was without deduplication, for dedup its supposed to be more like 5 GB/TB (no idea how true that is either)
Yeah, TB, oops, edited thanks!
That whole “1 GB per TB of capacity” is some generic rule someone made up once that doesn’t really have anything backing it up. It depends completely on your use case. If it’s mostly media storage that is rarely accessed, I’m sure that 4 GB is plenty.
I run a beefy TrueNAS server for a friends video production company with a 170 TB ZFS array, right now ARC is using 40 GB of RAM with 34 GB free that it’s not even bothering to touch, I’m sure most of the ARC space is just wasted as well. That’s just one example of how 1 TB = 1 GB makes no sense.
13 running on my little Synology.
Actually more than I expected, I would have guesses closer to 8
On my (OpenWrt) router, configured using the OpenWrt interface
Devices like laptops, tablets and phones, usually do not have Ethernet built in, or are too mobile to make it practical to use
What I did in the living room was plug a USB-C dock with a 2.5 Gbit Ethernet adapter into the wall outlet with a 2 meter USB-C 3.x cable.
So I sit down in the living room and plug in my laptop/phone in to charge when I’m using it and they automatically get a 2.5 Gbit network connection. Even iOS natively supports the common Realtek 2.5 Gbit chipset.
In Japan they have a beacon system to track traffic congestion which works anonymously and lets offline car navigation systems have good-quality traffic info.
For what it’s worth, Synology Hybrid RAID is just a fancy GUI over linux mdraid, so the drives can be mounted on any Linux system (Synology even have instructions for how to do this on their website). You’ll be SOL mounting them with any kind of third-party NAS GUI that expects their own partition layout though.
This is why I’m still using a Synology ¯\(ツ)/¯
I can install all the fun stuff I want in Docker, but for the core OS services, it’s outsourced to Synology to maintain for me
I guess technically, yes
All my stuff is running on a 6-year-old Synology D918+ that has a Celeron J3455 (4-core 1.5 GHz) but upgraded to 16 GB RAM.
Funny enough my router is far more powerful, it’s a Core i3-8100T, but I was picking out of the ThinkCentre Tiny options and was paranoid about the performance needed on a 10 Gbit internet connection
Same here in a Synology DS918+. It seems like the official Intel support numbers can be a bit pessimistic (maybe the higher density sticks/chips just didn’t exist back when the chip was certified?)
A used Lenovo ThinkCentre Tiny M720q mini PC, with the PCIe riser and an Intel chipset (Huawei) dual-10 Gbit NIC, running a pretty basic install of OpenWrt. Has no issue with 10 Gbit throughput, maxes out at about maybe 12 Gbit if you do a full duplex test, which I think may be a limitation of the limited PCIe lanes in the riser.
I got 10 Gbit internet at home, looked at the prices of 10 Gbit routers and noted right out! Built this for maybe $100 in stuff off of auctions.