Edit: sorry, I misread the question. I haven’t run into any docker containers that don’t run on incus, but my testing is limited.

Well, I have run the homeassistant core docker, calibre web automated, and a bunch more.

One just needs to add the docker https path to its repository and the rest is just translating the options to the way incus starts these. (Sorry, I can’t exactly remember what incus uses to run these containers.)

Anyway, I can dig up some helpful documentation if you’re rally interested.

I moved to incus from proxmox nearly 18 months ago and I haven’t looked back.

Yes, sorry. I meant incus, not incus os.

IncusOS supports OCI containers, which means it can run most docker containers natively. And LXC, and vms via QEMU/KVM.

Oh, OK! Brilliant, I will check on this and report back.

Tempus is great, good job.

Very nice.

I’m afraid to ask, but I can’t seem to figure out how to add an http stream to the radio section… Is this feature active?

Also I don’t think Proxmox cares about storage either,

Proxmox forces you to add a “storage area”, which is fine, except you must use their mount path of /mnt/pve/ and you must add NFS tuning switches via pve or they don’t work.

Proxmox is great, I used it for 8 years. But it is also opinionated and doesn’t like non-standard configs.

Fair enough!

Like I said, incus don’t care about your storage.

I’ve never used PBS, I’ve always just rolled my own. I currently keep 7 daily, 4 weekly and 4 monthly. My data mounts are all nfsv4.

Edit: isnt it possible to use pbs with non-proxmox systems?

Don’t use Proxmox, use incus. It’s way easier to run and doesn’t give a care about your storage.

Once you get to know the GUI well enough and start scripting, the GUI becomes less relevant.

Is this separate from a bind mount? Cause that doesn’t happen with bind mounts.

Yeah, I read this article twice now, and the only identifiable wrongdoing on FUTO’s part is donating to FOSS projects without using their “institutional practice”… Which is a bizarre complaint.

The article is rife with “something ain’t right at FUTO”, but fails to wrap words around that statement.

I dunno…most people just look at me blankly when I ask that question.

Well, I’ve been running Tempus alongside Tempo for a day and I’m ready to switch over, I’m uninstalling Tempo.

I use an always-on VPN back to my network and try to use my own collection as much as possible.

• I scrobble to listenbrainz, and this works well.
• Playlists work well
• I mostly listen to opus-encoded music, this is great.

Overall, a great experience, thank you.

That is apparently not the case anymore, but ZFS is certainly more rich in features and more battle-tested.

Be careful with unattended upgrades, even on alpine. A recent breaking change in python3 broke my alpine 23 ansible instance. Thankfully I have backups, but if you’re going to automate the upgrade, you should automate tests as well.

Nice!! Setting up now.

Edit: I’ve installed tempus and connected it to my subsonic server. I have a mix of m4a, MP3, flac and opus.

So far, it looks great.

Any features you want tested?

+1 for afraid.org.

12 years and counting, propagation is sufficiently fast.

Hmmm… Not strong on inference, either…

Really endearing yourself to your users, huh?