Oh yeah, the number of people that drop off the face of the earth after a couple message volleys is unreal. Definitely frustrating if you’re trying to get rid of something quickly.

It’s pretty good for buying/selling used stuff.

Bold of you to assume there is a healthy form of doom scrolling.

I admittedly do it after take-off.

Come on guys, that’s a whole 8TB.

Tooting the way you’d toot a horn/trumpet, or in this case an elephant trunk.

I can follow and see content from both accounts via the Ice Cubes app.

EDIT: I just realized you can’t see the posts in your timeline. I can only see as far as 2 days ago via my app, so unless you’re able to post an image more recent I can’t help out. Sorry!

I guess this ties into marketing, but I think rebranding the “fediverse” as the “social web” would be a good start. It has a broad neutral tone that I think is easier for regular people to latch on to.

I use it on occasion between Mastodon and Bluesky. My initial reaction was that I needed to organize my follows better so content wasn’t duplicating in the merged feed.

That’s a great point. Here’s the Mastodon donation link in case anyone was interested!

I think I could get behind an instance subscription, granted it wasn’t an obscene amount. I wonder what the upkeep on mastodon.social could be.

So basically sign-in with Google?

The government could control social media on their own instance, sure.

I think having government accounts come from an official instance would garner more trust in the platform.

Maybe next year we could reserve the center of the canvas to a fediverse logo to distinguish it from other canvas-like projects.

Looking forward to catching up on architecture and design blogs that never made the full migration to Mastodon.

I tried it out—it’s ok. Seems a little laggy on my end overall.

The words “Ukraine” and “nuked” should probably be used with special care at this particular moment in history.

If you’re a Trekkie @nocontexttrek@mastodon.social is always a good follow.

You asked what was missing, I engaged by reading your blog post and replied, without malice, that a link to the project would be good addition to your content.

I have no control over how you interpreted my comment, but somehow you took complete offense and showed us your entire asshole with a childish ad hominem attack.

It’s not about me, it’s about sending people directly to the thing they’re reading about.