I’d expected this but it still sucks.

  • mindlight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Along with the termination of perpetual licensing, Broadcom has also decided to discontinue the Free ESXi Hypervisor, marking it as EOGA (End of General Availability).

    Wiktionary: Adjective perpetual (not comparable) Lasting forever, or for an indefinitely long time.

    Hello ProxMox here I come!

    • kn33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re terminating in the sense that they won’t sell it anymore. They’re not breaking the licensing they’ve already sold (mostly, there was some fuckery with activating licensing they sold through third parties)

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hello ProxMox here I come!

      Proxmox is questionable open-source, performs poorly and will most likely end up burning the free users at some point. Get get yourself into LXC/LXD/Incus that does both containers and VMs, is way more performant and clean and is also available on Debian’s repositories.

            • TCB13@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              First they’re always nagging you to get a subscription. Then they make system upgrades harder for free customers. Then the gatekeep you from the enterprise repositories in true RedHat fashion and have important fixes from the pve-no-subscription repository multiple times.

              • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                As long as the source code is freely available, that’s entirely congruent with GPL, which is one of the most stringent licenses. You can lay a lot of criticism on their business practices, and I would not deploy this on my home server, but it haven’t seen any evidence that they’re infringing any licenses.

                • TCB13@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Okay if you want to strictly look at licenses per si no issues there. But the rest of what I described I believe we can agree is very questionable, takes into questionable open-source.

                  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    “How dare this business try to make money?!!”

                    Open source still has to exist within the framework of capitalism. I am all for building the fully automated luxury gay space communist utopia where people just build awesome software and release it for free all the time without ever having to worry about paying the bills (seriously, I would encourage every open-source advocate to think about how much more awesome stuff we would have if universal basic income was a thing), but that is simply not the world we’re in right now. They need to keep the lights on, and that means advertising their paid services.