• zhenbo_endle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      That’s my feelings too.

      Rollback to one day before (pre-Round 5), 1-3 teams were fighting for the last straw, and 3-1 teams were grabbing the VIP pass to stadium. These games were brutal. But for the three games between six 2-2 teams, it meant almost nothing

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nuOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        However you slice the group stage you’ll get some bad or low-stakes games. I feel like for me at least the swiss format this year was the best in a long time with more hype matches and series than any group stage I can remember.

        • zhenbo_endle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah, I totally agree. Old group stage had too many zero-stake games. This year, every swiss game might decide if a team would go home early

          • Coelacanth@feddit.nuOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            I do miss the times of old where all teams got to play on the main stage at least once. I hope I’ll be proven wrong next week but ever since Valve stepped away and gave the whole thing to PGL The International hasn’t felt the same.

      • theo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        In theory, winning would mean you have an easier elimination match as you will be placed up against a 1-3 team or someone else that has lost. Looking at the matchups though I don’t think there are any easy matchups, apart from maybe Wildcard. But I think that is down to how competitive it is rather than the tourney structure.