Welp. My Forgejo instance got popped with an RCE two days ago by CVE-2026-60004. Luckily, I noticed the following morning and had the day free to figure out what happened. Let’s dive in!
As a homelab enthusiast, I found this a very interesting post. Here are my take aways from the post that I’m implementing myself:
- Miner detection. I’ve updated monitoring rules to now watch the CPU on my hosts. If the same thing happened to me I would not have been alerted at all as I’m doing simple up / down monitoring. Fixed.
- Access logging. I turned on access logging for my homelab Caddy instances.
- Log retention. I have increased the amount and retention of my logging. The hope is this will help me reconstruct what happened after a breach.
- Logs offsite. The VPS access logs now ride along with the normal backup process, which runs hourly. The homelab side still only gets caught by the weekly VM backup, so that’s next.
- Closed an open signup. My webtrees instance (genealogy) had self registration enabled, which is the same door this guy got hit through. Oops. Fixed.
- Built a tool.
log-inventory.sh, so “could I actually reconstruct what happened” is a command I run instead of a thing I assume.
I don’t think I will ever be convinced to leave anything on my home network open to the internet no matter how convenient it is.
It’s fairly safe as long as you add a strong enough form of access control. For example if you put it behind a VPN, or a SSH tunnel, or require mTLS. Even a key in a custom HTTP header or Basic HTTP auth can be good enough if the key is strong enough.
You can further decrease the probability of drive-by bots reaching a publicly exposed service by merely scanning IPs and ports if you use a reverse proxy and hide your service FQDNs and IP.
You can do this by using TLS certs on wildcard domains rather than explicit domains, using explicit CNAMEs for the service subdomains rather than a wildcard domain, and keeping the A/AAAA records on an obfuscated subdomain rather than the base domain. If the bots can’t figure out a FQDN they’re not getting past the reverse proxy even if they find the IP and port.
This is obfuscation not real security but it cuts down tremendously on bot hits.
I wouldn’t count “behind a VPN” as “open to the internet”.
I have knockd listening on one very high port number, and only after accessing that reverse proxy whitelists the source ip. Sure some scanners might do a full port scan and try http only after that, but FQDN is required too. Plus I have geo ip list blocking all but my country. Oh and Crowdsec. So far so good…
Meanwhile my entire “homelab” except for HA is hosted on a VPS
I gave up , don’t have the time to maintain it anymore. Changed DNS to make my domain point to local lan IP so everything still works but only at home.
I wonder if the person who downvoted you thought you pointed your public DNS record to a 192.168 network, instead of making a change to your local DNS server like I’m assuming you did.
If you want https it’s gotta be a external DNS record anyway, might as well point to internal ips
Depending on how paranoid your setup is not everything will use the DHCP provided DNS servers
If you want https it’s gotta be a external DNS record anyway
Not sure what you mean by that, but off the top of my head, you can get certificates via challenges that prove DNS control (rather than checking if the DNS points to your server), and you can get wildcard certificates so you don’t even have to expose the existence of subdomains.
And that’s ignoring the option of using your own CA, which only really works with your own devices, but for local access might be viable.
So what you do is you have an external DNS that sharing your URL. You have the DNS point “myrealcoolurl.net” at 192.168.1.123. Now when anyone goes to “myrealcoolurl.net” the dns points them at 192.168.1.123 which worse case is their own router, if they are on your network though they get pointed at your server and are loving all your home hosted applications.
Now you can get a wildcard TLS cert issued for “myrealcoolyrl.net” and apps in your home network can use https. Anyone outside your network still gets whatever 192.168.1.123 means for them in their home network
I’m a bit confused by what you’re saying, because to my knowledge the DNS entry you’re mentioning won’t help with getting a certificate at all. Challenges will typically require either having the DNS entry point to a publicly reachable website (doesn’t get you wildcard) or proving the ability to modify records for the domain by adding something like a TXT record on the fly, which shouldn’t require A/AAAA records.
So you should be able to do the second type of challenge without a global A record to get a wildcard certificate, and use local DNS for the A record?
The challenge dosent require your site to be public only the DNS to be public. So your second description works.
Your serve talks to LetsEncrypt. LE gives your server a challenge. Your server adds the challenge record to your public dns. LE confirms the challenge and issues a dns-01 wildcard certificate to your server. LE never had to vist your site to confirm the challenge.
See for yourself and, from a terminal of your choosing, run
nslookup madpsy.nzYou should get back my local ip which doesnt work for anyone outside of my local network.
I should really do a security checkup on my setup…
Not updating stuff + Public sign ups enabled (did you even read the setup guide?) + Unrestricted internet access
Yeah I wonder what could possibly go wrong…
But great writeup
At least he got to learn from it. Never waste a good disaster.
And sharing it with peeps who haven’t encountered these vulnerabilities yet. We are all trying to improve and reading this is better than doomscrolling.
Also let’s be honest, it was entertaining.
Adventure is when trouble happened to somebody else! :p
Have you thought about log aggregation with something like Prometheus/graphana or ELK?
Lol thinking about cpu notifications for myself. I get notified when the fans ramp up on my server.
Also feed it to wazuh
Nice write up, also glad to see someone using bear blog in the field! Adding your blog to my RSS reader!
I’m thinking of adding Falco to my homelab.
Thanks for posting that. I hadn’t heard of falco before. Cncf graduated, open source, cloud native. I’m going to give this a shot.
Thanks for this! I didn’t understand any of it, but I hope to eventually.
What version of forgejo were you using? CVE-2026-60004 references gitea 1.27.1
Unfortunately, Forgejo only offers versioned image tags, meaning no latest tag. I still had mine pinned to v13 which reached EOL 6 months ago in January, 2026.
Glad I am not selfhosting or doing homelab, It is so out of my legau.
Don’t let this discourage you.
You can self host on your local network just fine and never portforward which is what exposes it to the outside.
I don’t need to watch tv or upload pictures to my server outside of my home. Its perfectly useable.
When you are ready and feel more confident you can setup your own wireguard vpn and only expose that.
Then Your device can connected to that vpn tunnels inside and can acces everything like home.
Currently without vpn your device is at risk every time it connects to a network you don’t own. A third party vpn is not a guarantee your data is safe either. Your home vpn though means all your outside the home networking is fully encrypted and outsiders cant even detect your home adresses is running a vpn to hack. (No ping unless you have the key)
This! Good advice! I went this path last year so i can give some extra advice for everyone who wants to start:
Before doing anything, buy a new router and put your iot devices and phones in a isolated guest network. Maintain the router updated. After that, you can work, learn and test without fear. Everything stays in your home.
Then like @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz already said, once you get confident, you can run a vpn tunnel to access your lan. This setup is pretty robust, hard to fuck up, and doable even for newbies. (If i can do it, everyone can, i assure you). Lots of guides out there.
Last advice, which you should already be doing, but setup a backup.
I have a lot of stuff self-hosted.
Just no outside access. Well, that’s not quite true, I do have a Tailscale VPN for remote management, but only certain machines are allowed to join, joins require my authorization, and access to the account is via two-factor.
The big thing with external access is to never permit it directly through your local connection. Do it though a Virtual Private Server (VPS) - let it get hit with access attempts. And then only allow specific traffic from the VPS to a specific service in your network using a VPN of some sort.
OIDC and zero signups for everything. I’ve been very happy with Pomerium (ZTNA) + Keycloak for all my public facing apps, although the free version doesn’t have any client signals which I was hoping for when I starteed.
My project this week is integrating the app logging I have into Crowdsec and start having Crowdsec do more analysis.
I just recently went through a much more benign, but scary nonetheless version of this.
I realized that my Ansible directory, that I had made public on GitHub to share as an example to some folks, had secrets committed and pushed.
It was the direct URL and credentials of an app I developed to store non-PII customer data. Now, it wouldn’t be the end of the world if someone noticed this and scraped the data, but it wouldn’t be good, either.
Luckily, I have Caddy access logs, and it appears no one ever accessed it.
So I pulled the secrets out of the Ansible directory and made the repo private, I rotated the credentials, and installed Crowdsec to monitor Caddy access logs and ban bad actors.
I only noticed the secrets because I had just setup Authelia as an OAuth2 provider for my homelab, and I was adding it to my backup scripts.
Ayy, just went through the same troubles with Authelia earlier this week.
Only 4 services I could conmect ao far but still neat to have :)
Good write up! Since you’re using Komodo already, are your compose stacks in git? Because if they are, check the renovate bot. It will read your files with their pinned image tags, check upstream for newer tags, and creates MRs (can also be set to auto merge) to update. Can be configured per stack.
About the only recent even I’ve had was when I was sitting at my desk reading an article. I noticed the mouse slightly move, but I hand no hand on the mouse. I sit there watching it, not manually moving the mouse or typing on the keyboard. It really freaked me out. Turns out, my old desk pad had a slight curl towards the edge the mouse was at, and the curl would make the mouse sense movement ever so slightly. I deployed a new desk pad, and things are back to normal. Whew!
My server got hacked once and was mining crypto! I noticed it when I heard the fans were at 100% when walking passed the room lol. Turns out, qbittorrent-nox used UPNP for its web admin endpoint enabled by default and qbittorrent can do many things like run custom scripts. My mistake was not changing its login credentials. Exposed my full system. Live and learn.
UPNP is a security nightmare, better to never enable it at all or if you must only for those networks where you need it.
Firewalling containers’ outbound access seems to be rare but another powerful layer of protection
