vendredi à 16h30 … curieusement, personne n’essaie de répondre à ta question 😋

42 000.²⁵ = 4 20 00.²⁵ users 🥳 !

Okay so … i made an edit to clarify what was the joke and what is the new standard way of writing numbers 👍😁

42 Monthly Active Users … that’s the final answer to life, the universe and a verything 😋
… i am surprised, i expected the figures to be in the thousands 🤣

Edit :

Web browser app.
… if it makes a difference from Linux web browsers or whatever other browsers.

i have very poor eyesight but some people are worse than me obviously 🤣
Here, use this :

🔍 😋

i’m not using an application … i’m just using a web browser and
… i understand the point of view of programmers and developers is quite far away of the point of view of us simple mortal users 🤣

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexadecanal

(…) In 2021, inhalation of hexadecanal was found to reduce aggression in men but to trigger aggression in women. Hexadecanal is one of the most abundant substances emitted by human babies from their heads, which may be an evolutionary survival mechanism to induce mothers to defend the baby and fathers to not attack it. (…)

GoDiverse …!

[meta] Quite surprising and irritating that the same post you made in !asklemmy was deleted ! Did you manage to save the resulting comments ?

No I was not sarcastic. So now i am trying to read your paper and i think that it is above my knowledge level.

As a layman i had the intuition that instead of having two accounts as i proposed for voting and commenting which was implemented by @rimu, we might have had something like blockchain or filecoin or some coin that would represent voting power and that would be based on our commenting value… so that coin would have been an intermediary to make voting anonymous.

Finally i know enough about science that i know that i don’t know much.

Edit : after a rapid overview of the article i would say that this method :
“Blind Signature-Based e-Voting”
would be most appropriate to our social media voting and i noticed the work they have done is more targeting national elections where the outcome is much more important.

Yes but … Navigation icon at the top right of the pages leads to these :
https://join.piefed.social/docs/piefed-mobile/ https://join.piefed.social/docs/developers/ https://join.piefed.social/docs/admin-guide/ https://join.piefed.social/docs/installation/
https://join.piefed.social/2024/06/22/piefed-features-for-growing-healthy-communities/

@rimu@piefed.social did great on my simple idea and this is very nice to know. He did not implement his other idea of having a pool of available robots that would vote one time each for each one vote of each one user(s) … also I thought it might be implemented in the frontend but he did implement it in the backend.

i did not say before but i was also thinking about complex mechanisms involving some kind of coin that would represent voting power that could be spent when voting or accumulated maybe with some loss of value with time … but then i read about the many research paper that were published about such things … in conclusion i believe we will see many other iterations of such social media.

thanks for the feedback 😌

Thanks @souperk@reddthat.com,
i believe many users will be interested in these papers about cryptographically secure voting.

Amongst them there would be :
@rimu@piefed.social
@SorteKanin@feddit.dk
@brbposting@sh.itjust.works

User’s votes anonymization through this system looks quite nice for me.

Let’s create separate accounts for voting and for posting so to improve anonymity and freedom of expression.

.
See better comment from kersploosh (administrator of …@ sh.itjust.works ) inside this post’s main comments

Someone closer to the developers than you are ?

❤️🍾🥂🍰

This seems very dangerous : just look at the photograph !