Regardless of the team size, I say simplify as much as you can so you can dedicate your resources customizing what makes their business special. You mentioned a PBX system and no infrastructure, this makes me think you talking about Customer Management. It sounds like you’re documenting as you go, fantastic. Maybe loop in a noob time to time to review the documentation or have a Q&A that reifies the docs. Best of luck!
- 0 Posts
- 13 Comments
I think a concern for the business is whether other people can help maintain the system. As such don’t go too custom and roll your own. Take things like nextcloud and see if you can fit the requirements by bolting on a few docker services. Keep it simple by using “appliances” where it makes sense (dedicated NAS?).
Stop confusing young autistic vulnerable people.
— Date Unknown
I’m old and autistic and not confused by the fact trans women are women. Hope that helps.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Is the Fediverse Too Complex? Can It Embrace Simplicity Without Losing Its Identity?English
12·1 year agoI think the fediverse is friendly enough. Instead of competing with corporations with streamlined experiences, develop power user tools that actually improve the content on the platform. Like I do want a powerful fediverse search tool, but it doesn’t need to be built into every server.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy's gaining popularity, so I thought new people should see this.English
7·1 year agoIt is like when racists say they’re race realists; it’s because the term “Soviet communism” isn’t that popular.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy's gaining popularity, so I thought new people should see this.English
1·1 year agodeleted by creator
zbyte64@awful.systemsto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy's gaining popularity, so I thought new people should see this.English
32·1 year agoI don’t see where Engels says Administration is “central planning”. It certainly seemed to have been an open question for Marx when he talks romantically of the Paris Communes.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy's gaining popularity, so I thought new people should see this.English
23·1 year agoYou have a sales pitch that works for the poorest countries, what do you have for the wealthiest?
zbyte64@awful.systemsto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy's gaining popularity, so I thought new people should see this.English
64·1 year agoFrankly I find this view disregards the differing material conditions that are present. Social Democrats are left of what the Americas have now, just like Capitalism was to the left of having a Monarchy. Your take is a-historical, anti-materialist, and thus anti-marxist.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy's gaining popularity, so I thought new people should see this.English
51·1 year agoThe funny thing is I thought you were talking about all the genocides, including those led by Russia, but then I saw your handle and realized you mean only those done by NATO and their allies.
But to think that our government, should it become
communistliberal, should be allowed to kill people in order to maintain asocialist or communistliberal or capitalist societySeems to me the real objection should not be the ideology but the existence of any system that must murder the people it governs in order to continue to govern.
everything we say is the purest truth possible!
People obsessed with purity will think like that.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy.ml tankie censorship problemEnglish
11·2 years agoYeah, very ironic that deleting misinformation is equated to deleting accurate information.

Communists are just as selfish as anyone else. Their point is that if we want a better life we need to move beyond capitalism, communism is an appeal to our selfish nature as much as it is a call for cooperation.