Threads’ roadmap for integrations with the fediverse, aka the network of decentralized apps that includes Twitter/X rival Mastodon and others, has been revealed. A new blog post by Tom Coates, the co-founder of an older decentralized app called Planetary, details the events of a December meeting at Meta’s offices where the Threads team had reached out to members of the fediverse community to get feedback about the Instagram-led project to take on X with a decentralized app that will eventually interoperate with others in the fediverse by way of the ActivityPub protocol.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean I get why people running open source, small software projects are going to find it hard not to be convinced just by the fact that they are probably getting their ego stroked super hard by meeting with extremely powerful and rich people… but this is such a stupid idea.

    We don’t need meta, they don’t DO anything. What does meta do for the fediverse? Sure you can argue it brings in a ton of users but meta is a for-profit entity and it is never going to truly bring those users into the fediverse. Meta has an absurd amount of money, if they haven’t committed to creating a fediverse like idea in the past what makes everyone think now is different?

    Why is a massive corporation with the money to fund 1000 fediverse software projects coming to a bunch of volunteers for help? Seriously, think about it, it really doesn’t make sense unless meta isn’t coming here for help but rather to mine and extract the value here for itself. We have ALREADY built most of the software tools that a too-big-to-function tech company with a lot of programmers could help with anyways, it is far too late in the game for meta to do anything meaningful there besides speed things up a little.

    If we accept meta into the fediverse it might seem like we are winning by technically adding a ton of users but for heaven’s sake people need to realize winning doesn’t mean giving all your shit to the other side. The fediverse will become barely any better than the current corporate social network world, so what is the point?

    I mean, they are NEVER going to invest in a significant amount of human moderators, that would basically admit the business model of a for-profit social network is fundamentally busted. They will “try” to do it with “””Ai””” and also through underpaid employees in moderation farms in third world countries who are constantly getting traumatized from having to see all the most offensive shit… but it is never going to work.

    The question is, why did you come here in the first place? For me, letting meta in violates most of those reasons.

    • Scew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wait, you mean you don’t like how algorithms and ads have evolved to almost be content at this point. You don’t want a bunch of for-profit ads suggesting you buy things you don’t need? Lol, you’re not in it for the cash grab? :OOOOO WHAT!?!?!?!?!

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      What does meta do for the fediverse?

      By that logic though, what does lemmy.ml do for the fediverse? Or mas.to? Or any specific instance? Nothing, they’re one cog in a pool of federated instances.

      And make no mistake, either the fediverse stays so tiny companies ignore it other than what Meta is doing now (to pre-empty EU legislation so they can point at supporting open interoperable formats), or we have to accept commercial enterprises will flood the fedi-space anyways if it takes off.

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah what do they? Just their size? So if Threads brings in huge amounts of federation users that’d automatically make them relevant and useful to have around? Size matters, especially when it comes to your federated instance?

      • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meta could take over the fediverse pretty easily once they’ve been here for a while.

        Nothing, they’re one cog in a pool of federated instances.

        Yes, Threads will be technically just an instance of a federated network with thousands of instances. But Threads is so fucking big in comparison that most posts will come from there. And at that point, they can impose their algorithms and recommendations on us.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        this is a joke, right? lemmy instances which i participate in have done a far better job of moderation and protecting minorities than any experience i have had on a meta product. i cant begin to tell you how many times ive reported content on meta services that is a blatant call to violence, only to have it come back “no violations found.” and im far from the only one

        safety. safety is what lemmy.ml/lemmy.blahaj.zone/mas.to bring to the fediverse. and where one instance fails, another is available to pick up slack. i refuse to subscribe to the notion that playing gullible for an institution which profits off the attention span of children is the only way for me to socialize online. you shouldn’t either. we all need to get over ourselves with this “must take off” language.