korendian@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 hours agoPixelfed user count has gone vertical.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1284arrow-down114
arrow-up1270arrow-down1imagePixelfed user count has gone vertical.lemmy.worldkorendian@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 hours agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-squareSabin10@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-22 hours agoIsn’t that a 1‰ growth or am I mathing wrong? Edit: I’m wrong and that’s why I shouldn’t comment first thing in the morning. The math is mathing, I’m just not braining.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-23 hours agoYou are mathing wrong. The GP is correct, except for the fact that it applies to the Y axis. (… it’s a much smaller change on the X axis anyway, something with 10 zeros before the first non-zero digit…)
minus-squareiAmTheTot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoOne percent of 300,000 would be 3,000.
Isn’t that a 1‰ growth or am I mathing wrong?
Edit: I’m wrong and that’s why I shouldn’t comment first thing in the morning. The math is mathing, I’m just not braining.
Its ~12%
You are mathing wrong. The GP is correct, except for the fact that it applies to the Y axis.
(… it’s a much smaller change on the X axis anyway, something with 10 zeros before the first non-zero digit…)
One percent of 300,000 would be 3,000.