• zhenbo_endle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s my feelings too.

        Rollback to one day before (pre-Round 5), 1-3 teams were fighting for the last straw, and 3-1 teams were grabbing the VIP pass to stadium. These games were brutal. But for the three games between six 2-2 teams, it meant almost nothing

        • Coelacanth@feddit.nuOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          However you slice the group stage you’ll get some bad or low-stakes games. I feel like for me at least the swiss format this year was the best in a long time with more hype matches and series than any group stage I can remember.

          • zhenbo_endle@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah, I totally agree. Old group stage had too many zero-stake games. This year, every swiss game might decide if a team would go home early

            • Coelacanth@feddit.nuOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              I do miss the times of old where all teams got to play on the main stage at least once. I hope I’ll be proven wrong next week but ever since Valve stepped away and gave the whole thing to PGL The International hasn’t felt the same.

        • theo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          In theory, winning would mean you have an easier elimination match as you will be placed up against a 1-3 team or someone else that has lost. Looking at the matchups though I don’t think there are any easy matchups, apart from maybe Wildcard. But I think that is down to how competitive it is rather than the tourney structure.